Accessibility decisions, backed by evidence

Find the barriers. Understand the impact. Fix what matters.

A11yChecks combines automated WCAG scanning, AI-assisted explanations, and human testing guidance so teams can move from raw findings to confident action.

  • WCAG 2.2 A & AA
  • No account for a free scan
  • Human review built in
Illustrative scan workspace
Public page review

Checkout accessibility scan

Review ready
6Failures
11Needs review
42Passed checks
AATarget
Prioritize these findingsIllustrative data
Form field has no accessible nameWCAG 4.1.2 · PaymentSerious
Error message is not announcedWCAG 3.3.1 · ShippingModerate
Focus indicator needs reviewWCAG 2.4.7 · Sign inReview
Next stepVerify the payment flow with keyboard and screen reader testing.Open testing guidance →

Try it on a public page

Start with one page. Leave with a clearer plan.

Enter a URL you are authorized to test. A11yChecks runs automated checks mapped to WCAG 2.2 A and AA, explains the findings, and identifies where human judgment is still required.

Scan one public page at a time with no hourly limit during results verification. Private or local-network addresses cannot be scanned. Automated testing does not prove conformance.

From findings to priorities

A long issue list is not a remediation strategy.

Useful audit evidence should help teams understand what failed, who is affected, how to verify the barrier, and what to do next. A11yChecks organizes automated signals while keeping the limits of automation visible.

Explore detailed WCAG checks →
Example findingSerious

Required form feedback is not announced to assistive technology.

User impact
A screen-reader user may not know why submission failed.
Recommended action
Associate the message with the field and announce the updated state.
Verification
Retest the complete form flow with keyboard and a screen reader.

Technology starts the review. People complete it.

Automated testing is valuable, but accessibility is ultimately about whether people can perceive, understand, navigate, and complete real tasks.

01

Catch repeatable patterns

Automated checks quickly surface detectable issues in structure, names, contrast, forms, and other testable rules.

02

Explain the finding

AI-assisted summaries translate technical signals into clearer context without pretending to prove conformance.

03

Validate real journeys

Keyboard, screen-reader, zoom, reflow, responsive, and usability testing confirm what automation cannot.

04

Retest after the fix

Repeat the same method, preserve evidence, and turn successful fixes into reusable product patterns.

Start with the decision in front of you

Different roles need different answers from the same evidence.

Product and QA

What should we fix first?

Connect findings to user impact, affected workflows, acceptance criteria, and repeatable regression checks.

Open the checking hub →
Accessibility and compliance

What still needs human review?

Separate automated failures from manual criteria and document the testing method used for each decision.

Review criteria →
Procurement teams

Can we trust the evidence?

Review VPAT and ACR claims, identify gaps, ask better vendor questions, and record an evidence-based risk decision.

Use procurement tools →

A practical audit loop

From URL to usable evidence.

Move through a transparent sequence that preserves the distinction between automated results and human verification.

Read accessibility best practices →
  1. 1

    Scan the page

    Collect automated WCAG signals from a public page you are authorized to test.

  2. 2

    Understand the result

    Review impact, affected elements, rule context, and suggested next steps.

  3. 3

    Complete manual testing

    Validate keyboard access, assistive technology behavior, zoom, reflow, and real workflows.

  4. 4

    Fix and verify

    Resolve the barrier, rerun the method, and retain evidence for future releases.

Illustrative conformance evidenceSample ACR review
CriterionLevelStatus
1.1.1 Non-text contentASupports
2.4.7 Focus visibleAANeeds evidence
4.1.2 Name, role, valueAReview claim
Open VPAT and ACR guidance →

Evidence for procurement and audit

Ask better questions before accepting a conformance claim.

Use structured review tools to compare vendor statements with testing evidence, document unresolved risks, and prepare a defensible decision.

  • WCAG 2.1 and 2.2 criterion-level guidance
  • VPAT and ACR credibility checks
  • Risk triggers and decision worksheets
  • Manual-review prompts for unsupported claims

Learn by experiencing the difference

Compare inaccessible patterns with working solutions.

Use hands-on examples to practice keyboard testing, inspect semantics, listen with a screen reader, and understand why small implementation details matter.

Enter the training lab
Barrier

Label shown visually, but missing from the code

A screen reader announces only “edit text.”

Accessible pattern

Visible label programmatically connected

The purpose is clear visually and to assistive technology.

Make the next release easier to use

Turn accessibility findings into informed action.

Scan one page now or bring a real product to a focused A11yChecks walkthrough.